garlichead
Über Member
That's a good one, but probably not.I wonder if the phrase "searing seals in the juices" will ever disappear?
mjb.
That's a good one, but probably not.I wonder if the phrase "searing seals in the juices" will ever disappear?
mjb.
I had to read that about five times to figure it out - I kept thinking you were somehow searing seal meat in some juices, and saying to myself, "Wait, that should be braising seals () in juices, right?"I wonder if the phrase "searing seals in the juices" will ever disappear?
mjb.
I wonder if the phrase "searing seals in the juices" will ever disappear?
mjb.
That was hilarious TR......the English language eh!I had to read that about five times to figure it out - I kept thinking you were somehow searing seal meat in some juices, and saying to myself, "Wait, that should be braising seals () in juices, right?"
Yep, it's to develop flavor and color if a sauce is another end goal.Its another one I've occasionally heard professional chefs say. What it does is produce the Maillard effect I believe.
And thats why no matter how good a chef is, you should never just mindlessly parrot back what they say.I wonder if the phrase "searing seals in the juices" will ever disappear?
mjb.
Myth: Tomato is a fruit, not a vegetable!
So there's layers to this one. Yes, its correct that tomatoes are considered a fruit by the botanical definition of "fruit". However the botanical definition of fruit is very different from what we usually call a fruit. There's quite a few things we call vegetables are are actually botanical fruits, and some things we call fruits that aren't.
However, there is no such thing as a "botanical vegetable". The word "vegetable" only has meaning in the culinary sense. So that means, if you're asking if a tomato is a fruit or a vegetable, you must be talking about the culinary definition of fruit. So a tomato is still a vegetable, and does not belong in a fruit salad.
Not sure any more but back in the day cooking wine was popular especially in institutional kitchens, which is really inexpensive wine with salt added, basically rendering it undrinkable. Personally it depends on the food I'm making. If the wine profile is an important component of the dish, generally a sauce then I will get more specific. For an overall wine taste in desserts, sauces et al I generally recommend something you would enjoy drinking and there's nothing wrong with a decent boxed local wine either for this application. To clarify I also don't advise anyone use a Chambertin Grand Cru or a Chateau d Yquem for example, that would be a waste and expensive.I don't know if that's a myth, but some people told me there is no good sauce from cheap wine and that I should never ever start to use the cheapest wine for cooking. It's a fact that all the professional kitchens I've worked for used... well the cheapest wine you can get. From 5* hotels even to a michelin star (I don't know the actual term, they don't have one yet but maybe they will get one next year, excuse me) attender (?).
The sauce is as good as the wine. If you use Fred Flinstone´s Special, at $3 a litre, then your sauce will taste like that. Cheap and nasty.I don't know if that's a myth, but some people told me there is no good sauce from cheap wine and that I should never ever start to use the cheapest wine for cooking. It's a fact that all the professional kitchens I've worked for used... well the cheapest wine you can get.