I'm not thinking it would fly in the U.S. That whole prohabition failure kinda makes us a little jumpy when people start messing with our alcohol. Tho we are a lot less sensitive about tobacco which is taxed heavily.
Please help me understand; what would be the purpose to set prices?
There isn't much evidence that it works.
Can you produce any evidence that "there isn't much evidence"? I thought that it had been trialled in several parts of the UK (Bristol? Plymouth? Glasgow?) and that there had been positive and tangible benefits. And no, I can't quote official reports, stats etc - but I thought in the interests of having a balanced conversation, it's worth mentioning that there is another side to this story. Anyone who has been unfortunate enough to be in a town centre just about anywhere in England on a Friday or Saturday night in the last 20 years will know that there is a major problem - and, I would have thought, would welcome any steps that are taken to deal with it.
He had a book of laminated pages of real sliced lungs of smokers that you could look thru
So expense and attainability does not always relate to use.