You made a reference to a website which has nothing to do with Ken Hom. If you simply repeat 'Wok King' or refer me to website called Wokking, how am I meant to know that you realise the chef is Ken Hom?What was this then?http://wokking.ie/
You made a reference to a website which has nothing to do with Ken Hom. If you simply repeat 'Wok King' or refer me to website called Wokking, how am I meant to know that you realise the chef is Ken Hom?What was this then?http://wokking.ie/
Cryptic answer.You made a reference to a website which has nothing to do with Ken Hom. If you simply repeat 'Wok King' or refer me to website called Wokking, how am I meant to know that you realise the chef is Ken Hom?
Not cryptic enough! I reckon you could be very good at cryptic clues somehow...Cryptic answer.
You seemed to have missed it!Not cryptic enough! I reckon you could be very good at cryptic clues somehow...
Well perhaps you better spell it out to me.It entirely possible I've missed the point!You seemed to have missed it!
"Wok king" being a name that he's known by, and the recipe posted, a variation on one of his.Well perhaps you better spell it out to me.It entirely possible I've missed the point!
Try it, you don't know!I was contemplating compiling a cryptic crossword on the subject of food and drink. Judging by the crashing wave of apathy that followed these cryptic clues, I don't see much of a future for this plan.
Well, rather than a whole crossword, perhaps just a clue at a time? I'd certainly have a go... as would @classic33, I trust.I was contemplating compiling a cryptic crossword on the subject of food and drink. Judging by the crashing wave of apathy that followed these cryptic clues, I don't see much of a future for this plan.
Perhaps they are just too complicated for most of us? It was beyond me!I was contemplating compiling a cryptic crossword on the subject of food and drink. Judging by the crashing wave of apathy that followed these cryptic clues, I don't see much of a future for this plan.
Well, rather than a whole crossword, perhaps just a clue at a time? I'd certainly have a go... as would @classic33, I trust.