Most Indian restaurants in the UK aren't actually Indian either.....I've had "Indian" meals in quite a few different countries, including Iceland, which allows me to say that I have been to the world's most northerly Indian restaurant. However, I use inverted commas because a lot of restaurants that are labelled "Indian" are, in fact, not Indian. I had a thoroughly excellent meal in a restaurant in Copenhagen. The frontage proclaimed "Indian restaurant," but in fact the people running it were of Pakistani origin. This also happens with Bangladeshi restaurants.
On that basis, am I allowed to say "Indian sub-continent" for my choice of food?
Also worth bearing in mind that curries may well have gone to Asia from Europe.
Fish & Chips in the UK has its own regional variations, especially around the coast.
Fish n chips in Leeds [where I came from] were Haddock / cod fried in dripping and fresh cut [real - no processed stuff] chips. On the coast they often included fish that should have been left in the sea or used as fertilizer complete with skin and often bonesFor example?
I think both points are valid. I would guess that most dishes that we regard as ethnic, national or regional probably developed during a time frame that probably started when eating habits became civilised - tables, cutlery etc., and ended early last century, post imperialism. Whilst traditions remain strong in places I suggest that this is in the hands of the older generations. As communities become more global and eating habits becomes more homogenised (and probably American) due to tv and the Internet I wonder how long it will be before distinctions between regional dishes disappear.I cannot agree with you sidevalve. Yes certainly, there is a great deal of cross fertilisation and that absolutely is a simple reality of the modern world of global communication and widespread international travel. But that cultural and national identity in cuisine still prevails, and actually remains very strong, seems obvious to me. Rick Stein’s travelogues in Greece, in Italy and in Spain make that very obvious. That there are clear distinctions between each of the nations and even the sub-cultures within those nations of all of the South-East Asian nations is another obvious example.
Flat fish were common around the South East coast, cod & haddock further North.For example?
Flat fish were common around the South East coast, cod & haddock further North.
Deep fried salmon in Galway, more than once.
And what about the sole fish?
One of the flat fish mentioned.Haddock, I have read there is a lot also in Scotland.
And what about the sole fish? Is also used for fish and chips?