Yes, it is true that the basics are good to master before developing something new. This is true of history and of almost everything in life. Past generations have learned the best ways to deal with certain matters through trial and error, so long-term learning should be valued and the skills of the experienced should be appreciated.Those eggs would make me happy happy. Yeah, don't get me wrong I have been combining cuisines from the get go, actually fusion had not been coined or at least I hadn't heard that name when I first started combining Asian food with French food back in the 70's. Some of those dishes have morphed and I still use them. I'm known for my fusion food, but the cuisine that is first and foremost for me is French.
I believe in order to become a good through a very skilled cook, professional or home cook, is to understand the craft as thoroughly as possible and take it on as an apprentice would. When you have a gold standard recipe of a particular cuisine then and only then can you learn that dish or decide to change that dish or combine it with another cuisine that you know thoroughly as well. In the 80's and 90's fusion food was everywhere, every kitchen chef regardless of their skill was throwing fusion food at the public with a wide range of success. Most of it was just some of the worst food that has ever hit a plate and eventually fusion died out simply because it was diluted to the point that people didn't know or care anymore, sad really. That is a profession in dire need for direction or redirection. Todays chefs have their own mountains to climb with the back to basic style that is here now. You better know what your doing because you have nowhere to hide and with "chef" being the new celebrity there's been an influx of people going to culinary school that believe they know it all right after graduation then finding out they probably should have thought it through more thoroughly before they took on a huge debt going to the C.I.A. Personally I think a prerequisite for any culinary school should be a minimum time spent in a restaurant kitchen.
Again casually I don't care what anybody does but if someone is going to be specific then it needs to be somewhat accurate or eventually the dilution eventually waters down the basic understanding and it turns into a free for all and chaos, and that's not desirable or fare for people that want to take cooking more seriously.
I’m all the same annoyed with arrogant rookies who consider themselves Masters of the Universe. Some of them are pitiful, some comical - and some of them keep us on our toes. Alfred Adler (a late Austrian shrink) has said: "The greater the feeling of inferiority that has been experienced, the more powerful is the urge to conquest and the more violent the emotional agitation". However, sometimes these roosters show unprecedented innovation in science, art or in the culinary world, so I guess it’s best to be humble in the face of life and give value to everyone — even those arrogant beginners. It is plausible that Siberia will teach them in time (a Finnish saying). People learn their lessons in different ways: some of us through the hard way. I value skills and experience in all aspects of life. Social skills, empathy and understanding are amongst them. I suck in social skills and self-discipline but I'm doing my best to improve myself.
There's a culinary school (foodservice, baking; confectionary, catering etc.) nearby. I often buy products from their street level shop & cafeteria and sometimes have (or had pre-Covid) a cup of coffee there, so I've heard the teachers talk about the hardships in teaching culinary basics to restless youngsters with attitude problems, mental disorders and conjoined smartphones. Still, the teachers still seem to love their work and keep teaching the best they can - with a smile.
Btw, some more mature, arrogant chefs are just as annoying.
Last edited: