That just focuses on the nomenclature, though, doesn't it, while ignoring the act itself? The concerning thing isn't whether someone calls it an assault rifle or a squirreling gun, it's more the act of rushing the state capitol, regardless of the reason, armed. Yes, I know there's no ban (yet) on weapons in the state capitol there, but it's that kind of muscle-flexing that's the issue that should be debated, not whether a particular firearm is called this or that.
As a gun owner myself (though not an enthusiast) please note, I'm not getting into whether people should own or use any particular firearm, or what their rights are, or any kind of 2nd amendment discussion. I'm only commenting on how, in general terms, arguing over labels ignores the real subject. It's like saying, "That truck just ran down my mother-in-law," and having someone respond, "That wasn't a truck, it was a panel van, so quit complaining!" It ignores the real issue.
I think open carry would curb a lot of crime!